Assessment 3 - Case Study Analysis Brand and Product Management

MKT304A
Subject name Brand and Product Management
Assessment title Assessment 3 - Case Study Analysis
Group or individual assessment Individual
Length 2500 words (+/-10%)
Learning outcomes addressed outco

a)
b)
c)
d) This assessments addresses the following learning mes:
Analyse the role of brand and product strategy in the organisation.
Identify problems and questions in relation to contemporary brand and product management. Discuss the issues and challenges businesses face in successfully
Assess the marketplace in terms of the consumer, competitors, trends and organisational objectives.
f)
Evaluate brand and product performance through the application of relevant key performance indicators and other metrics.
Submission date 11:55pm Friday of Week 11
Total marks 100 Marks
Weighting 40%
Results
Assessment Brief:
Section 1
The Brand Report Card Report by Kevin Lane Keller.
Available here: https://hbr.org/2000/01/the-brand-report-card
Please read.
Section 2
Using the information in the Brand Report Card by Kevin Lane Keller and the theory you gained during this trimester please select a brand from the list and answer the following 10 questions. Each question is worth 10 marks.
Brand Selection
Qantas
McDonalds Pepsi
Boost Juice
Myers
Questions
1. How does the brand excel at delivering the benefits customers truly desire?
2. How does the brand stay relevant?
3. How is the pricing strategy based on the consumers’ perception of value?
4. Is the brand positioned properly?
5. Is the brand consistent with their marketing program?
6. Does the brand portfolio and hierarchy make sense?
7. Does the brand make use and co-ordinates a full repertoire of marketing activities to build brand equity?
8. Do you believe the brand understand what it means to the consumers eg “who am I?
9. Do you believe the company who owns the brand or the brand itself offers proper ongoing marketing programs to support the brand?
10. In your opinion do you see evidence that the brand monitor’s its sources of brand equity?
Marking criteria
Excellent 10-9 Good
8-7 Average 6-5 Not adequate 4-3 Poor 2-0
Each of the 10 questions are worth 10 marks Clear information provided, well
answered, shows
strong evidence of independent
thought used supported by relevant examples Good
information provided,
shows some independent thought and examples Basic information
provided, small
independent thought Lacking in information and
independent
thought but some
information provided Not enough information provided
Total points /100 points

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accounting Business Research Memo

Use of Psychosocial Theories in Nursing

Assessment 1: Report